| NORTH EAST ENQUIRER |
| Guest Column Vol. 1 Issue No. 3 | Jan.7 - 21, 2002 |
Brachin: Again a simmering ‘concept’ Brachin, more a political than social concept, was raised in mid ’80s. Sandeep Banerjee The
old
concept of ‘Brachin’ has again started brewing up slowly. The
Indo-Myanmar border areas are a confluence ground of many ethnic tribes.
Quite similar to each other, most of these tribes are seeking right to
self-determination, which has in turn given rise to insurgency. The Nagas
inhabiting India and Myanmar are known to be playing a crucial role in
militant activities. Other North Eastern outfits like the ULFA are also
known to have made forays into Myanmar for contacts and arms. In order to
contain this run of insurgency on the Indo-Myanmar border, the concept of a
‘Brachin’ state comprising ethnic tribes the Brahmaputra and the
Chindwin valley was conceived. Brachin was a concept of brotherhood among
minority ethnic groups which had reached its crest by mid ’80s. The
underground groups in the North-East face the need for network. Brachin was
more a political than social concept. The different groups were basically in
the same situation. This juxtaposition called for unity and a common call of
rejection against mainstream or mainland India. The
rise in strength of the NSCN (IM) was slowly viewed as a potential threat by
the other North Eastern outfits. It may be recalled that some of the outfits
like the ULFA, DHD, UPDS, Dragon Toru, Peoples Liberation Army (PLA),
Revolutionary Democratic Front (RDF), the Achik National Volunteer, the NSCN
(K) along with the Chin Liberation Army of Myanmar had loosely formed a
front called the United Liberation Front of Seven Sisters (ULFSS) to thwart
the expansionist designs of the NSCN (I-M). This feeling of threat was more
embedded when the Central Government decided to give much respect to NSCN (IM)’s
demands and the Naga ceasefire without territorial limits was announced
earlier this year. The ULFA had outrightly described it as a conspiracy to
divide the people of the North East. While the NSCN (IM) is hollering for
‘Nagalim’, the anti-Naga ceasefire movement has a number of secessionist
forces in Manipur as well as Myanmar. The
years of Naga ceasefire have intensified the struggle and conflicts between
groups in the North East and Myanmar. In the North-East, the struggle
between the Nagas and the Meities has turned worse. Nagas feel that they can
trust the Meities no more. The ceasefire has brought the Kukis closer to the
Meities even as the former is fighting for a separate state. The resurfacing
of the concept of Brachin at this time may have larger
implications. This concept apart from passifying the divergent forces at
work in the region, can act as a counter balance to the Chinese influence in
Myanmar. Economy wise, the Chinese presence at the door of the North-East,
may have great benefits as well as significant socio-cultural implications. | Headlines
| Editorial | From
Other Publications | |
Your Visit No